3 ms·
> as it requires ~3x more memory. Not sure were you've seen this, but that's absolutely not normal. The YJIT memory overhead is certainly sizeable, but is gene
by byroot 4y ago
> as it requires ~3x more memory.
Not sure were you've seen this, but that's absolutely not normal. The YJIT memory overhead is certainly sizeable, but is generally at least an order of magnitude smaller than that.
- ezekg 4y agoReddit. Per this discussion here: https://old.reddit.com/r/ruby/comments/zzbrch/how_much_memory_is_yjit_supposed_to_consume/j2cxy9d/ https://old.reddit.com/r/ruby/comments/zzbrch/how_much_memor.... My production workload shows similar results. The YJIT app's memory sits at about 2.4x what my non-YJIT app utilizes. Sidekiq sits at 3x.