3 ms·
> It's crazy how amazing the service was It wasn't amazing though. GeForce NOW is so much better, at least for me. Higher resolution, more responsive, better s
by ctvo 4y ago
> It's crazy how amazing the service was
It wasn't amazing though. GeForce NOW is so much better, at least for me. Higher resolution, more responsive, better selection of titles.
I'm an early adopter of cloud based GPUs. I've tried them all. Inn the last ~6 months GeForce NOW has finally made it so I can play AAA titles seamlessly. I can't tell the difference between local vs. cloud. Your experience may differ if you play competitive online games, but for single player games -- it's replaced any desire I have for a gaming PC.
- sofixa 4y agoGFN has the better quality nowadays, but back when they both launched it was pretty similar. However GFN 's UX has always been subpar because their abstraction layer over Windows regularly leaks - I've had Windows crashes which resulted in lost game progress, I've had to reauth, including random password and MFA to game launchers, shortcuts doing the wrong thing on the wrong layer.
- ChildOfChaos 4y agoNo it's not, Geforce now is rubbish and more expensive. I tried it yesterday and it crashed within 30 seconds after multiple issues and the image quality is far worse than Stadia, it also doesn't have all the nice features Stadia has. I was using Geforce now when it was beta, but you can tell it's just streaming a PC, where as with Stadia everything was purpose built and worked great from Chrome. Geforce now sucks compared to Stadia.
- ctvo 4y agoNah. You may be using it wrong.