Wouldn’t this evidence also be consistent with being “not near enough to the edge to perceive an edge”? And also consistent with that, because of the expansion

Wouldn’t this evidence also be consistent with being “not near enough to the edge to perceive an edge”? And also consistent with that, because of the expansion of the universe we will never be able to get a signal from the “edge” to know anyway? My problem with an infinite isomorphic universe is that it implies infinite mass. I don’t know enough about cosmology or other physics to understand all the implications, but to me it seems like it would make models of the early universe janky - ie why would it not just immediately collapse in on itself?