The author has also made a significant factual error in another article that he cites as additional evidence in this one. >Previously, I pointed out aspects of

The author has also made a significant factual error in another article that he cites as additional evidence in this one. >Previously, I pointed out aspects of ChatGPT that implied humans were helping craft the chatbot’s responses. He links as a source an article where he gets ChatGPT to recall a detail from earlier in the current conversation, claims that is not a capability of ChatGPT, and insists that means there is a human editor involved. But that is a capability of ChatGPT. It has limited local recall, with a small token budget, but it absolutely will remember the name of the fake company the author made up in their first question. That entire article lambasting the tech is based on a completely incorrect assumption, declared by the author with absolute confidence. Edit: The author is not on twitter, there's no comment section or contact information provided. There's no means provided to even redress this analysis published on fallacious logic.