> clear indications the stalker is actively planning to do harm. You might be interested in the "cannibal cop" case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stat

> clear indications the stalker is actively planning to do harm. You might be interested in the "cannibal cop" case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Valle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Valle Where, exactly, is the line crossed between "this guy is talking shit" and "this guy is actively planning to do harm?" (I don't know where I even stand on that case. The ramifications of every alternate outcome is equally unsettling.)