I fail to see how a failure to properly label a different product with the appropriate health warnings is a an argument to also fail with a different one. If a

I fail to see how a failure to properly label a different product with the appropriate health warnings is a an argument to also fail with a different one. If a risk exists, proper labelling is warranted regardless of substance. I'd also like to point out that the Canadian Cancer Society (one of the groups highly involved with advocated for labelling) has also issued statements about inhalation (of any substance). So they quite literally have done the thing that you accuse them of having not done.