4 ms·
The reason this is interesting is not so much that some companies have apparently provided backdoors so that governments can spy on their users. We already knew
by pash 15y ago
The reason this is interesting is not so much that some companies have apparently provided backdoors so that governments can spy on their users. We already knew (or could reasonably surmise) that that was happening.
No, the fun part is that one government's spies (India's) have apparently used these backdoors to spy on the agents of another country (the US). So, you see, by mandating these sorts of security compromises, governments have in fact made it easier for foreign governments to steal their own secrets—an irony apparently lost on the author of the Indian memo and on the authors of these policies.
- awda 15y agoPrecisely.
- billybob 15y agoExactly. Any backdoor comes with the possibility of use by other parties - hackers, foreign governments, etc. Which is why they are always unacceptable, even if you trust the US government (or whoever is asking for it), including everyone who does or ever will work for them (which is an absurd risk).