4 ms·
Yeah, I guess maybe this is what a 300 Multiple Choices[1] response was intended for but that seems to be underspecified and I’ve never seen it used. [1] https
by kshay 4y ago
Yeah, I guess maybe this is what a 300 Multiple Choices[1] response was intended for but that seems to be underspecified and I’ve never seen it used.
[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7231#section-6.4.1 https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7231#section-6.4.1
- brewmarche 4y agoI vaguely remember a web server set up for language content negotiation failing to determine which version to send and giving me a list of links to the individual language versions instead. I think it was Apache and the negotiable resource was called X.html while the individual linked versions had names like X.en.html etc. Might that have been a 300 response?