2 ms·

> Real effectiveness is negative. Your whole comment reeks BS. I don't see any plausible explanation for _negative_ effectiveness. And you don't link any data

> Real effectiveness is negative. Your whole comment reeks BS. I don't see any plausible explanation for _negative_ effectiveness. And you don't link any data to support your point.

VagueMag 4y ago
These comment threads are all posted on a link to a scientific paper showing that mRNA vaccines may cause class switching to a type of antibodies which cause tolerance (reduced immune response) to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Vaccine enhanced disease is not a new phenomenon and not outside the realm of possibility for the COVID vaccines.
fidgewidge 4y ago
I was once like you. When I first learned about negative effectiveness I thought that was crazy. That's not possible surely? Hah. I was such a child. It can happen, has happened in the past with other vaccines and has now happened in a big way with COVID vaccines. The biological mechanisms are well known by immunologists for many years, look for "OAS" and imprinting. Or heck read the fine article we're discussing on this thread, which is about the body making the wrong sort of antibodies due to over-exposure (which makes it easier to become infected). You don't have to believe me. Maybe you'll believe Dr Fauci: https://youtu.be/uagsb4wii3E?t=3401 https://youtu.be/uagsb4wii3E?t=3401 so when you have that many people in a trial 56:41 not only are you looking to see if it works but you're constantly keeping your eye 56:47 on safety to make sure that a vaccine actually doesn't enhance disease He says they have to watch to make sure vaccines don't enhance disease, because negative effectiveness is a problem that's occurred in the past especially with HIV vaccines. So now we established that my comment doesn't reek of BS, here's data on covid vaxx negative efficacy: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/theres-something-antigenic-in-denmark https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/theres-something-antigeni... https://dailysceptic.org/tag/negative-efficacy/ https://dailysceptic.org/tag/negative-efficacy/ Follow the white rabbit but don't use search engines. Searching the obvious queries on both google and duckduckgo gives back CDC propaganda and none of the results actually discuss negative efficacy. The extent of the coverup is pathetic.

> Real effectiveness is negative. Your whole comment reeks BS. I don't see any plausible explanation for _negative_ effectiveness. And you don't link any data to support your point.

VagueMag 4y ago

These comment threads are all posted on a link to a scientific paper showing that mRNA vaccines may cause class switching to a type of antibodies which cause tolerance (reduced immune response) to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Vaccine enhanced disease is not a new phenomenon and not outside the realm of possibility for the COVID vaccines.

fidgewidge 4y ago

I was once like you. When I first learned about negative effectiveness I thought that was crazy. That's not possible surely? Hah. I was such a child. It can happen, has happened in the past with other vaccines and has now happened in a big way with COVID vaccines. The biological mechanisms are well known by immunologists for many years, look for "OAS" and imprinting. Or heck read the fine article we're discussing on this thread, which is about the body making the wrong sort of antibodies due to over-exposure (which makes it easier to become infected). You don't have to believe me. Maybe you'll believe Dr Fauci: https://youtu.be/uagsb4wii3E?t=3401 https://youtu.be/uagsb4wii3E?t=3401 so when you have that many people in a trial 56:41 not only are you looking to see if it works but you're constantly keeping your eye 56:47 on safety to make sure that a vaccine actually doesn't enhance disease He says they have to watch to make sure vaccines don't enhance disease, because negative effectiveness is a problem that's occurred in the past especially with HIV vaccines. So now we established that my comment doesn't reek of BS, here's data on covid vaxx negative efficacy: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/theres-something-antigenic-in-denmark https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/theres-something-antigeni... https://dailysceptic.org/tag/negative-efficacy/ https://dailysceptic.org/tag/negative-efficacy/ Follow the white rabbit but don't use search engines. Searching the obvious queries on both google and duckduckgo gives back CDC propaganda and none of the results actually discuss negative efficacy. The extent of the coverup is pathetic.