4 ms·
I feel it somewhat obvious that humans talking to humans is a good thing for life and death split second stuff, same page there. But aren't most of the comms
by blamazon 4y ago
I feel it somewhat obvious that humans talking to humans is a good thing for life and death split second stuff, same page there.
But aren't most of the comms really rote and mundane instructions that follow a standard pattern? We trust automated systems to land the plane, [1] why not to tell a plane to say, cross runway 22 and stop at threshold Z?
A human could still give that instruction, but with a button instead of their mouth parts flapping? Then the radio channel would be more open for higher urgency stuff.
[1]: https://youtu.be/LyVuGQUl2bA https://youtu.be/LyVuGQUl2bA