4 ms·
If their agenda is for people to live in a better environment than it's bad by default? I would understand your approach, if you'd be able to find the bias in t
by rgavuliak 4y ago
If their agenda is for people to live in a better environment than it's bad by default? I would understand your approach, if you'd be able to find the bias in the study or proof of them lying/manipulating facts, but isn't this just a bit too contrarian of an approach?
- tptacek 4y agoI think the issue is, when you take that tack, you're not doing science anymore; it's just bare advocacy. And, indeed, if you look at EWG resources like their "tap water database" (super popular, punch in your zip code and they'll do their level best to terrify you), you've got something that is very much pretending to be a scientific resource while very much deliberately not being used that way.