2 ms·
Why do Go enthusiasts look at types that specialize more generic data structures to ensure invariants and scoff? Maybe go only ever needed []byte, and nothing e
by eptcyka 4y ago
Why do Go enthusiasts look at types that specialize more generic data structures to ensure invariants and scoff? Maybe go only ever needed []byte, and nothing else - it's always just bytes anyway, right?
Moreover, when the go team accomplishes the same goals by extending the language instead of using a library, this is well received.
- stickupkid 4y agoSpecifically to the arena, this required integration with the GC, so couldn't be done as an external library. Hence why a language spec was required.
- klodolph 4y ago> Why do Go enthusiasts look at types that specialize more generic data structures to ensure invariants and scoff? I'm sorry, I'm not really sure what difference between Buffer and byte[] in Java I'm supposed to care about, except for the details of how these objects are allocated in memory. There is not really any semantic difference between them, as far as I can tell. Maybe I don't understand what you're saying--I'd love for you to clarify the reasons why you think Go developers are, I guess, a little bit dense, or foolish, or whatever negative adjectives you like to apply to people who use Go (you know, rather than talking about the language itself--it's always fun to make fun of people).