3 ms·
The only misunderstanding is that you think that you can refute the guy on the n-th time that they trot out the same old known-false talking point. They wanted
by SideburnsOfDoom 4y ago
The only misunderstanding is that you think that you can refute the guy on the n-th time that they trot out the same old known-false talking point. They wanted an argument, because algorithms can't tell it from engagement with the story that they're pushing. They didn't want and don't even known truth, and just give more confident aggressive BS replies to further the con. Don't waste your time, use the "flag" button.
- acdha 4y agoYeah, I did that too but wanted to say something in case someone else read the thread who wasn’t as familiar with this.
- yucky 4y agoAs far as "safe" goes, how many deaths are we seeing from people with the Polio or MMR vaccines? As far as "effective" goes, how many people with either of those vaccines still get Polio, mumps, measles, rubella? So Polio, MMR etc are "safe and effective" vaccines. Do you see the difference?