4 ms·
It's not a misunderstanding of statistics, you just didn't answer the question. How can something be considered "safe and effective" when the majority of people
by yucky 4y ago
It's not a misunderstanding of statistics, you just didn't answer the question. How can something be considered "safe and effective" when the majority of people dying have had the vaccine?
You're making the argument that you're better off with the vaccine than without it, and depending on your demographic cohort this is generally true (young males excluded). That's the question you answered, but it's not relevant to the question I asked. How can you call it safe and effective when most people dying are vaccinated? That's not very safe or effective.
The polio vaccine is safe and effective. MMR vaccine is safe and effective. This shit is neither.
- acdha 4y agoI would strongly suggest reading your own link, which explains this, or the replies you’ve been getting summarizing this. The reason people say they’re safe and effective is because that’s what the preponderance of scientific evidence around the world shows. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#covidnet-hospitalizations-vaccination https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#covidnet-hospitali... > In November 2022, compared to adults ages 18 years and older who received an updated COVID-19 bivalent booster dose, monthly rates of COVID-19-associated hospitalizations were 16.0x Higher in Unvaccinated and 2.7x Higher in Vaccinated Adults without an updated booster.
- yucky 4y agoLet's try it this way, since we're speaking different languages. Most people have the Polio vaccine, more even than the Covid vaccine. Yet thousands of people aren't regularly dying from polio in the US despite being vaccinated. Same goes for MMR, and the other vaccines we all got. So the polio vaccine is "Safe and effective". The MMR vaccine is "safe and effective". See the difference?