3 ms·
The thing is, there's vanishingly few "good invasions". Even fewer when you're intent on annexing territory and capturing resources and large numbers of people
by mlyle 4y ago
The thing is, there's vanishingly few "good invasions".
Even fewer when you're intent on annexing territory and capturing resources and large numbers of people.
The logic error you've committed above: Stifling dissent about the war with authoritarian measures may not be a necessary condition for an invasion to be bad, but it still can be a hint that the invasion is bad.
Rejecting the territorial integrity of the country invaded, similarly, can be a pretty good hint.
- FpUser 4y ago>"Even fewer when you're intent on annexing territory and capturing resources and large numbers of people." As ugly as it sounds I would actually prefer that the US had annexed countries it had invaded. This way it would at least be responsible and people would leave in more decent place than before. Instead they came in, murdered and otherwise fucked people and then left without much remorse and repercussion.