3 ms·
These defaults seem like a reasonable, pro-consumer choice. Great to know there's at least one vendor that helps to get around the restrictions Secure Boot crea
by 4cao 4y ago
These defaults seem like a reasonable, pro-consumer choice. Great to know there's at least one vendor that helps to get around the restrictions Secure Boot creates for the user.
Secure Boot has always been an anti-feature, at least from the user's point of view. It seems really strange to complain your device isn't locked down enough by default: the restrictions can always be enabled manually if that's your kink.
- charcircuit 4y agoBy that logic any security feature is an antifeature. The problem with that logic is that you can't ignore the potential harm that is being protected against.
- 4cao 4y agoSecurity from the user, not for the user, is an anti-feature from the user's point of view. Security features in general are not.
- charcircuit 4y agoOkay, but secure boot's purpose is protecting against malware.