Dawkins invalidating the notion that the eye is irreducably complex: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nwew5gHoh3E https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nwew5gHoh3E. S

Dawkins invalidating the notion that the eye is irreducably complex: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nwew5gHoh3E https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nwew5gHoh3E. Showing quite clearly how incremental beneficial change leads to the development of complex features. But it will never matter to creationists: https://creation.com/the-design-of-tears-an-example-of-irreducible-complexity https://creation.com/the-design-of-tears-an-example-of-irred.... (Don't even bother with that last link.) They'll always just build another straw man.