So it's more like putting a lipstick on a long dead design. Sure may look fresh from afar, but it still stinks. What I am trying to say is that at this level o

So it's more like putting a lipstick on a long dead design. Sure may look fresh from afar, but it still stinks. What I am trying to say is that at this level of power consumption Intel should be many times faster than M1 - that is offering substantially better performance per watt. Sure there are niche applications where power consumption doesn't matter and only the single core performance counts, but could older tech be overclocked and achieved the same result? Not sure. Point being is that what Intel does is increasing pollution and causing people to bin perfectly working machines just because there is a "new" CPU on the block, where in real life they probably won't see a difference. It's really irresponsible thing to do for Intel. They should go back to the drawing board and stop releasing meaningless products until they actually get something worth upgrading to.