3 ms·
This argument is 'irreducible complexity' from Intelligent Design, a pseudoscientific attempt to shoehorn creationism back into science education. https://en.w
by pvg 4y ago
This argument is 'irreducible complexity' from Intelligent Design, a pseudoscientific attempt to shoehorn creationism back into science education.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity
is a good starting point, of course you can also just google 'intelligent design' and go from there.
- yarg 4y agoDawkins invalidating the notion that the eye is irreducably complex: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nwew5gHoh3E https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nwew5gHoh3E. Showing quite clearly how incremental beneficial change leads to the development of complex features. But it will never matter to creationists: https://creation.com/the-design-of-tears-an-example-of-irreducible-complexity https://creation.com/the-design-of-tears-an-example-of-irred.... (Don't even bother with that last link.) They'll always just build another straw man.