4 ms·
And a ton of people are cross-shopping more expensive newer parts with still-available 5000 series CPUs which are much cheaper. There’s an interesting question
by Godel_unicode 4y ago
And a ton of people are cross-shopping more expensive newer parts with still-available 5000 series CPUs which are much cheaper. There’s an interesting question about whether absolute performance is more important or if you should weight that against cost and/or power.
The GN benchmarks recently have done a good with explaining both the cost perspective and the performance-per-watt.
Edit: for reference, Newegg currently has the 5950x and 7950x at $500 and $600 respectively. And that’s before the higher platform cost for AM5/DDR5.
- vondur 4y agoThe 5950x uses DDR4. The 7000 Ryzen series uses DDR5.
- Godel_unicode 4y agoHow is that different than what I said? To quote myself: > higher platform cost for AM5/DDR5
- fbdab103 4y agoIf reading a review of the newest vendor's product, it is only fair to give the performance of the competitor's similar generation release. If there are strong availability/price concerns (eg generation N+1 is triple the cost of generation N) those should be noted as to why not performing the most appropriate apples-to-apples comparison. Calculating performance / dollar is an entirely different exercise (though valuable, and rare is it the newest generation that hits the sweet spot).
- Godel_unicode 4y agoThat’s one definition of fair, sure. I use a different one; how does this option compare to my other options, sans artificial constraints. As another example of this, there’s a great mkbhd video comparing new cheap smartphones with old flagship smartphones. He does that every couple years, and it always gets a ton of “I never thought of that” comments.