* It’s not a replacement for those things, but given its rate of improvement, I could see it being a highly effective adjunct to them over the next few years.*

* It’s not a replacement for those things, but given its rate of improvement, I could see it being a highly effective adjunct to them over the next few years.* This seems like a platitude of the type when people say “there is nothing wrong with capitalism, but”. Why won’t it be a replacement in a few years? Seeems therapist could be one of thousands of jobs replaced by this. Are chess engines an adjunct to grandmasters? Kasparov espoused a “centaur” theory for a couple yearsthat a human plus a computer beats a computer alone, but that is now way outdated. Computers beat humans period.