5 ms·
To keep _buying_ their taxpayer-funded water. That sounds pretty libertarian to me, but so does the price going up to find supply/demand equilibrium.
by throwaway-blaze 4y ago
To keep _buying_ their taxpayer-funded water. That sounds pretty libertarian to me, but so does the price going up to find supply/demand equilibrium.
- kjs3 4y agoExcept that's not what they seem to want, at least how I read it. They want cheap water (or at least something other than a straight up supply/demand driven cost), and they think the government owes them that. I think there's a word for that sort of mentality, but it's not 'libertarian'.