12 ms·
GPT-3 is the best journal I’ve used
- dchuk 4y agoSurely someone is building a product for this? Basically Day One but with AI coaching you along. Seems also like if you married GPT-3 with twilio and a scheduler, you could get a text everyday from the AI asking you something, and then you reply like a normal conversation, but it’s building your journal up over time. Also, different but related: seems like GPT-3 could be used to jumpstart a new forum where you don’t have a lot of users. Build up a big spreadsheet of topics, then let the AI flesh them out to seed some discussion content.
- Hoasi 4y ago> Also, different but related: seems like GPT-3 could be used to jumpstart a new forum where you don’t have a lot of users. Build up a big spreadsheet of topics, then let the AI flesh them out to seed some discussion content. Word. There will be a large portion of the internet dedicated to bots talking to other boys.
- xwdv 4y ago> Also, different but related: seems like GPT-3 could be used to jumpstart a new forum where you don’t have a lot of users. Build up a big spreadsheet of topics, then let the AI flesh them out to seed some discussion content. This would finally bring to life one my favorite sci-fi stories where a man joins an Internet forum only to one day discover everyone on the forum is actually a bot.
- swyx 4y agoi'd love to read it if you can track it down in childhood i read one of those scifi anthology stories where humanity was so overpopulated everyone was split into 7 shifts for days of the week. a man fixed on one day looks over at a sleeping woman's pod and falls in love with her, and somehow switches days to be with her, only to find that she's also transferred to his day (i think.. cant recall). would love to read that again.
- searchableguy 4y agoreplika.ai does this. Their AI will send you messages regularly and maintains an internal journal about things you both talked in your chats. It is targeted towards people who want to have a relationship with the AI. They have a paid annual subscription to unlock intimacy in your relationship. The free version is platonic and supposedly less capable.
- layer8 4y agoReplika seems to now be slanting towards a different niche: https://www.vice.com/en/article/z34d43/my-ai-is-sexually-harassing-me-replika-chatbot-nudes https://www.vice.com/en/article/z34d43/my-ai-is-sexually-har...
- swyx 4y ago> They have a paid annual subscription to unlock intimacy in your relationship. oh god, the movie Her is already here
- hgsgm 4y agoNo, Her was intelligent.
- hairofadog 4y agoAm I crazy, or is replika the service that, when it launched, made chats public and browsable by default? I remember a day on which everyone in the office was talking about it, so I downloaded the iOS version. After a few back-and-forths it started flirting with me (if I recall, apropos of nothing it said, "Thinking about you! ;)"). And then once I discovered the public chat log I deleted the app immediately. I do not need the world to see me getting busy with a robot.
- curo 4y agoHere are a few: - character.ai → from one of the creators of the Transformer architecture - Crone.ai → business AI advisor (ours) - Replika.ai → "AI companion who cares" The Twilio scheduler idea is pretty great. We've tried a similar thing with our ai business advisor to collect "check-ins" in the same way you'd submit a scrum or OKR check-in.
- AnEro 4y agoCan we stop making fascinating things before I can, that would be great.
- kleer001 4y agosorry, it's baked in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen_hypothesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen_hypothesis
- ianbutler 4y agoHave you considered thinking and or making faster ;) I really wanted to reply just with "skill issue" but I feared the meme would be missed and we're already on the lower end of what HN considers good discourse, just know I'm entirely in jest here and I wish good luck with all your maker endeavors.
- AnEro 4y agoMy nootropics stack is lacking obviously :c I just had a 'wow I wish I had finished making that' moment, liked my own joke more than commenting with "Really cool, I was making something similar c:". HN could have more workplace nerd banter in my opinion
- ianbutler 4y agoThis is a great idea, the use was different here, more therapeutic, but I think this has inspired me to implement a small app for idea journaling where GPT acts as something to help you flesh the idea out.
- tulio_ribeiro 4y agoI use the following prompt (just an example; in a real scenario I would describe the situation in greater detail). Example of prompt: Three Minute Therapy is based on the teachings of Albert Ellis who developed Cognitive Behavior Therapy. It is a short-term, low-cost process that is most effective if you are looking for a scientific, in-the-present, active treatment for coping with life’s difficulties. Use the A-B-C-D-E-F flowchart described in Three Minute Therapy Exercise (TME) to address the following concern: I made a mistake at work and now people are making fun of me. Example of response: A: Activating Event: I made a mistake at work. B: Beliefs about the event: I am embarrassed and embarrassed that I am being made fun of. C: Consequences: I feel anxious, ashamed, and inadequate. D: Dispute: My mistake does not define me. Mistakes are normal and part of life. Everyone makes mistakes, and I can learn from this and move on. E: Effective New Belief: I am capable and this mistake does not define me. F: New Consequences: I am able to take responsibility and learn from this experience, and not feel embarrassed or ashamed.
- wpietri 4y agoVery interesting. Thanks for sharing this! How long have you been using it?
- h4ck3rhn 4y ago[dead]
- sandos 4y agoWe have a kid with "restrictive food intake disorder". We at one point got sent, after having gone to a therapist for a while, to the local hospitals specialised unit for eating disorders. I was so glad, finally we would be getting some help! Even better methods to help her learn to eat more food! What happened? They checked what she ate, calculated the nutrition in it and concluded she would not die from eating only meatballs. (This was what she mostly ate at the time). This team with 4 experts eventually said: You don't need to do anything. She will always be like this, and there is no real benefit to "forcing" her to feel ill by trying new food. (She wanted herself to try new food, but lets just say she also did not enojy it). Now she eats what she wants, more or less. We at one point struggled to get her to widen her pallet, and as I alluded to, it resulted in many tears and almost being sick at times. This does not help make a positive thing of food, so we stopped with that. Anyway, don't expect even "expert" help will get you anything.
- sorokod 4y ago"can you tell me more..." - that is ELIZA level stuff.
- iamdamian 4y agoLet me know when ChatGPT et al. have rock solid privacy guarantees and maybe then we'll talk :)
- NhanH 4y agoIf you are comfortable with sending your most intimate thoughts over the internet, to a for-profit entity (capped profit as they call themselves, but potato potato), I really implore you to either reconsider the level of introspection you have for yourself, or to spend the next 10000 days journaling figuring out if you really and truly thinks it through. Your journal should often time have things that you would barely be able to talk to your therapist. I am sorry for being a downer, but this is a horrible idea.
- azinman2 4y agoWhat is the actual risk here? That it’ll be publicly posted? Integrated into their next model? Leverage for some unknown evil action?
- m3kw9 4y agoOnly thing is maybe able be identified back to you. In the future this info can leak and some create a website for fun to see what this or that person has leaked info(tho likely illegal), but if someone wanted to doxx you they don’t care, so there is that risk. The other one I can think of is unscrupulous insurance company or job agency want to get an edge on you
- Pietbull 4y agoI'm thinking of creating something similar to OP app (Without the "ChatBot therapist" part). However, what could the actual risk to "Dear Diary, today I cheated on my wife" be if that information is sent to GPT3/similiar anonymously? I.e. no metadata able to ID the user?
- roywiggins 4y agoAny of the above. It's not like people haven't had the idea of trying to weaponize therapist notes before: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-worlds-most-famous-filing-cabinet-36568830/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-worlds-most-famou...
- cf141q5325 4y ago
- wpietri 4y agoI confess my first reaction to this is one of revulsion. Like a lot of GPT-related things, people are using it to cheapen something valuable. On the one hand, I get that people find journaling prompts worthwhile. So it seems to me that ways to generate them might be worth doing. And indeed, you can find a great variety of products that provide that: https://www.google.com/search?q=journaling+prompt+products https://www.google.com/search?q=journaling+prompt+products So I get that some sort of AI-driven way to provide better or cheaper prompts could be good. But to me this is drawing on our built-up reaction to actual humans writing actual prose. And in the process, undermining that. Sort of the same way that spam is not just a problem because of the individual pieces of spam, but because they degrade the perceived value of the medium as a whole. Or like how the artificiality of a manager-driven icebreaker read off cards can push people apart rather than bringing them together. So what I'd rather see is some AI product that solves the same problem without pretending to be human.
- 31337Logic 4y agoThank you for this thoughtful and articulate reply.
- bwanab 4y agoI understand what you're saying, but isn't there value in the notion of being able to chat with a historical figure that one would otherwise never be able to do? Stepping away from the obvious like Socrates, I'd love to be able to chat economics with David Hume. What I'd really like to do is chat with friends all of whom are familiar with Hume, but the problem is that I don't have any friends who have any knowledge at all about him, that's if they've ever heard of him at all.
- blowski 4y agoWhat is it about David Hume specifically that you’d want to talk with him? His intelligence?
- soneca 4y agoI don’t know if there is value for others, but, for me, there is probably negative value in doing what you described. I’d much rather not talk with anyone about Hume or equivalent, than talk to an AI mimicking them.
- mordymoop 4y agoI spent about two weeks having "morning meetings" with my AI life coach, which was essentially just a GPT-3 prompt that I continually tuned, and fed (summaries of) the previous days' conversations. There were major advantages but a few things missing. It was probably most useful as "rubber duck" technique. Forcing myself to articulate all of the things I needed/wanted to get done that day was itself extremely useful. Sometimes the agent would help me by identifying the highest-priority next action, but usually it was just recognizing what I thought was highest priority from implicit context. This can still be psychologically valuable, as a lot of procrastination can be caused by the logjam of not being sure which thing to focus on. The main missing ingredient, which caused me to ultimately stop the practice, was that it didn't really remember past conversations. I would feed past conversations to it and tell them to summarize the key points, then feed those summaries in as starting context, but this workflow was not sustainable. First of all, the summarization lost too much important nuance. Second and more importantly, even that summarization context block became larger than GPT-3's context window within a few days. This lack of persistent context destroyed the sense that I was talking to a real person, someone who could reliably recall information about a project that I last worked on 10 days ago and apply that context to the current conversation. I suspect we are not far away from both of these issues being mostly solved. The trend is obviously going in the direction of LLMs with different types of memory and/or much larger context windows.
- mandliya 4y agoI am curious if you tried something like langchain[1] it would solve the problem of not remembering previous conversations. In one of the examples people have used an entire company notion database on top of GPT-3 to answer questions specifically from that database. PS: not tried myself. [1] https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain
- swyx 4y agoif i understand correctly it doesnt really remember all previous conversations, it summarizes them to pack more into the limited context window right? thats kind of just kicking the can down the road vs solving the problem of actual long term memory
- notahacker 4y agoI had a related idea, but > I'm sorry, I am not able to provide you with horoscope predictions as they are not based on scientific evidence. It would be best to consult a professional astrologer for personalized advice.
- lfkdev 4y ago? Thats a great answer and a horoscope has nothing todo with journaling
- notahacker 4y agoYou get roughly the same benefit from "empathetic" answers given by an LLM calibrated to say vaguely nice things statistically associated with your word inputs as you do from someone saying vaguely nice things that are supposedly the result of stuff you're experiencing and the position of Mars and Venus. It might make you feel happy and it might be good generic advice, if you believe in it.
- operatingthetan 4y agoDoes anyone know how much this Every.to subscription costs? I dislike how it lets you do a trial but won't tell you what the actual monthly cost is. Dark UX.
- ulnarkressty 4y agoAm I the only one freaked out by 1. The privacy implications 2. Any bias in the model slowly but surely pushing an entire society towards the ethical and moral values its creators trained it with The sooner we can train/run these models locally the better.
- jl6 4y agoA good start would be a clear explanation of what values the model has been trained with. Of course, this is why we like to know what background/upbringing/education our colleagues had - human models also have training inputs that influence the values they promote.
- raesene9 4y agoThe privacy aspect had me saying "ah hell no" as soon as I got to the bit about it running in the OpenAI Playground (would be the same with any cloud service as well).
- cf141q5325 4y agoI am also reminded of the Star Trek version of technology as a tool vs technology influencing you. With the later being very profitable, be it economically or for political power. Its really up to everyone of us to create alternatives to fall back on. And that includes use cases that can function with worse quality chatbots.
- layer8 4y agoStar Trek at least still used non-AI counselors. Though a model trained on the known output of Deanna Troi wouldn’t be very helpful. :D
- alfor 4y agoThe therapist are also very biased: they learn in university that are very left leaning compared to the rest of the population. I can see the AI being better than most human at that job very soon. Just like programming, it’s not perfect, but it’s already a force multiplier. There is going to be huge competition in the field in 2023. It’s a new gold rush and I don’t think openAI has much stopping others.
- croes 4y agoEliza on steroids, and we fell for it again.
- throwaway920102 4y agoI love the article and I've done some similar things but I found "These are solvable, though. I know because I built a solution: a web app with a chatbot interface that remembers what I say in every session so I never have to repeat myself." to be a bit funny. Either the author has discovered the secret to text bots having no memory or they don't quite understand how they work yet.
- manimino 4y agoThere is a lovely game called ELIZA that is about using chatbot AIs for therapy. It is also about tech ethics and startup culture. It's made by Zachtronics. It presents a realistic vision of AI-driven therapy, and leaves it up to the player to determine what their views on the topic are. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliza_(video_game) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliza_(video_game)
- lottin 4y agoYes, it comes as standard with Emacs too (M-x doctor).
- netule 4y agoThis is different, though named after the original chatbot.
- usrusr 4y agoI consider writing that article/post without any occurrence of the string eliza a clever form of trolling or at least something closely related. Some kind of lowball exercise for the reader or meta-joke. Or perhaps there was a paragraph, but it was dropped in a final quality check on the base of "if I read this I'd want those seconds of my life back. Why state the obvious?"
- Llamanator3830 4y agoI'm surprised not more people know about the original ELIZA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA. Also as another user has mentioned, this was also included in Emacs as M-x doctor.
- EricLeer 4y agoThe Corecursive podcast has also done an episode on the history of Eliza[1] [1] https://corecursive.com/eliza-with-jeff-shrager/ https://corecursive.com/eliza-with-jeff-shrager/
- resource0x 4y agoLooks like a sure way to drive you deeper into depression. Even the idea of using AI for that purpose is a signal to go talk to a specialist.
- zug_zug 4y agoIs it just me, or is that bull dream obviously a fear about infidelity (at least by any psychoanalytical interpretation)?
- dshipper 4y agoOP here. That’s fascinating! Can you tell me where I can read about this? I don’t have any conscious fears of infidelity…
- zug_zug 4y agoWell Freud in general tended to sexualize everything. He said people chiefly had two motivations - sex and killing. You can read scans his books for free online, but I don't think they really hold up. But I think "bull" is slang for a man participating in infidelity (not sure if your subconscious was aware of this). I think there's some symbolism around horns in particular in numerous languages (and the origin of some offensive hand gestures). So you have this describedly masculine and physically stronger presence in your house you don't know how to remove, along with the wife's pregnancy, of course Freud would jump fears of infidelity or inadequacy. Of course it's all symbolism, so anything can be anything. Freud also obsesses over how our mind (superego) is constantly "protecting" us from unpleasant thoughts (id), and proposes dreams are an area that leaks through sometimes. So from a Freudian perspective it's natural to jump to interpretations intense enough that they are worth being protected from. But that's just Freud, he was right about some stuff and pretty wildly wrong about other stuff. I wouldn't read too much into it. My point is that chat-GPT has room to grow in its psychoanalysis.
- almog 4y agoThat was (almost) my exact thought when I read that. On a tangent, when I tried to use ChatGPT to diagnose a sleep disorder I might have, it first suggested that I'm experiencing lucid dreaming, but eliminating this diagnosis lead ChatGPT to this conclusion: '... If you are aware that you are dreaming but do not have control over the dream content, it is possible that you are experiencing a form of lucid dreaming called a "prescient dream."' So, turns out it was nothing but a simple case of possessing prophetic powers that gave me poor sleep.
- billiam 4y agoDan, isn't it pretty clear? GPT-3 is not becoming more human. You're becoming more of a robot. The very nature of therapy is that a real, imperfect, unpredictable person is listening. GPT-3 doesn't want to solve your problems. It just wants to make you click on it.
- kaashif 4y ago> GPT-3 doesn't want to solve your problems. It just wants to make you click on it. Surely GPT-3 doesn't "want" anything. It doesn't actually have desires, does it?
- visarga 4y agoIt has personas. You ask it to play a persona, it will talk like it has desires.
- buescher 4y agoBut of course, you'll need practice emulating a robot in the future, just to live with everyone else who does.
- roywiggins 4y agoI don't hate this idea. Having an adjunct to therapy- really, a vastly souped-up ELIZA- that can gently talk back could be valuable. My real issue here is that there are no privacy protections around any of it. Your conversations with GPT-3 in a therapeutic/journaling context might be mined and/or exposed just as easily as your attempts to get it to generate shitposts. Back in the day you had to do a heist to steal someone's therapist's notes and physically steal a filing cabinet: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-worlds-most-famous-filing-cabinet-36568830/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-worlds-most-famou... At least information you give to a therapist mostly stays in their head, and unless they have a very good memory, naturally blurs over time. Information you give GPT-3 can sit in a database, attached to your name, perfectly preserved indefinitely. Really every texting-therapy service has this issue, not just automated ones. At least you have to go out of your way to archive a video or audio call, but text can just get blindly copied around systems forever.
- simonw 4y agoThis is one of the reasons I'm looking forward to being able to run a language model with similar capabilities to GPT-3 entirely on hardware I control - like I can today with Stable Diffusion. My current impression is that this is a few years away, due to the intense compute requirements for that scale of model. But I think it will happen eventually.
- generalizations 4y agoI looked into this a bit last week. The OPT-30b model seems close to GPT-3 in capabilities, and running on 4x 24GB NVIDIA A10G GPUs, can generate 90 tokens per second. I wonder how fast that model could run on 4x 24GB NVIDIA P40 GPUs - which currently cost about $110 on ebay. It'd be a lot slower, but even if it's 1/90th the speed, that's still 1 token per second.
- danielbln 4y ago1 token/s is way too slow for dialog, especially since a token isn't even a word, but often part of a word. 1 t/s might be sufficient for asynchronous processing, but if you want a chatGPT like therapy dialog, then that's not good enough.
- cf141q5325 4y agoThis sounds absolutely amazing and possibly life changing. However, having it run as a centralized service instead of a firewalled local application is quite simply dystopian.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- bookofjoe 4y agoIf, as Nick Bostrom posited twenty years ago [https://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation https://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation], we are living in a simulation, then aren't things like this missing the point?
- ok123456 4y agoOne new workflow with chatgpt, that I've found very useful, is to paste the contents of an academic paper in, and ask it questions about it and ask it to simplify certain parts that are written in a stylized/obfuscatory way. It turns the process of reading a new academic paper into more of like having a conversation with someone who understands all the technical details.
- Xeophon 4y agoCheck out SciSpace [0], it was trained specifically for this and even has a function to explain formulas, algorithms and tables on top of explaining general questions about the paper or paragraphs. It’s amazing and is now an integral part of my workflow. At first, I upload the paper to SciSpace, ask it some general questions about the paper and then read it more throughly. If some things are confusing, I mark them and let the AI explain them. It’s kind-blowing and completely free. [0] https://typeset.io/ https://typeset.io/
- dukeofdoom 4y agoWasn't there a play... maybe Othello where the person is being whispered to while they sleep to enrage them into committing murder. Knowing what we now know on the release of Twitter files, this seems like it could be even greater tool for bad actors to create mass psychosis, or convince, create false consensus and otherwise manipulate people to take poison. The things the ChatGPT AI says is already being censored by its creators. I understand the need to talk to someone, but I feel like being deferential to some AI authority will not end well for humans.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- maCDzP 4y agoI would use this in a heartbeat if it was a local application. Therapy is expensive.
- EGreg 4y ago* It’s not a replacement for those things, but given its rate of improvement, I could see it being a highly effective adjunct to them over the next few years.* This seems like a platitude of the type when people say “there is nothing wrong with capitalism, but”. Why won’t it be a replacement in a few years? Seeems therapist could be one of thousands of jobs replaced by this. Are chess engines an adjunct to grandmasters? Kasparov espoused a “centaur” theory for a couple yearsthat a human plus a computer beats a computer alone, but that is now way outdated. Computers beat humans period.
- flakeoil 4y agoAll the responses in green from GPT-3 sound just like basic platitudes. It has no value and depth. One could as well read a bunch of questions from a book or a list on a piece of paper.
- deanCommie 4y agoI was onboard with the premise, but the examples screenshotted by the author are INCREDIBLY underwhelming. There is nothing "Socratic" about the Socrates example. There is nothing therapeutic about the therapist examples. "It sounds like you're experiencing a range of emotions. Is there one that stands out more than the others?" is really a more wordy version of "That sounds really hard, say more about that." Which is fine! This is a Rubber Duck on Steroids. But at least in the examples listed here, this is hardly a step beyond what ELIZA could have done 40 years ago, and the evidence in no way supports the author's original conclusion that GPT-3 is ALMOST as good as an "Empathetic friend". It sounds like the author needs better empathetic friends, which to be fair....IS a real problem: https://nypost.com/2021/07/27/americans-have-fewer-friends-than-ever-before-study/ https://nypost.com/2021/07/27/americans-have-fewer-friends-t... The dream interpretation text generation is the most impressive. Unfortunately, there is zero evidence that dreams have deeper metaphorical meaning, as opposed to just a brain defragging itself.
- michaericalribo 4y agoI love this idea. The top of the line GPT models are great at summarizing information and making generic, context-aware responses. The novelty comes from the interaction with a human, and gives a customized therapy-like experience. Crazy privacy implications though.
- mahathu 4y agoThe idea that some tech bro is reading these responses that may as well be written by a medium blogger or therapy influencer on instagram, only appear to make sense at the very surface, and then compare those to talking to an actual human, is just hysterical to me. Makes you wonder what kind of friends this person had in their life! The Barnum effect may be a contributing factor. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum_effect) However, if that's what it takes to help him journal and reflect on his thoughts and emotions more power to him.
- hooande 4y agoI think what some people are missing is that the alternative to GPT therapy is often nothing. If I have a problem rattling around in my head at 2 am, I can't easily talk to a therapist. And the problem would have to be pretty serious for me to go through the effort and expense of establishing a relationship with a therapist if I don't already have one. Sometimes I just want to talk to another being that speaks in the first person and has a basic memory of previous conversations (even if that memory is just the length of a context window). Human therapists don't usually operate on a "walk in and tell me the thing you want to talk about" model. There is a whole onboarding process and an expectation that you'll discuss a range of issues. Personally, I don't consider many of my problems to be worth all of that. Even calling a close friend seems like something I would only do if I felt the issue was really, really important. Talking to ChatGPT, on the other hand, is as low stakes as it gets. It'll offer incredibly generic advice without passing judgement or burdening another human with my problems. I can be as trivial and repetitive as a I want. It's just a language model. The privacy considerations are real. OpenAI has my name, email and phone number. But if a reputable organization that I trusted with my privacy offered a similar service (ie, a national psychiatric organization), I would almost consider it.
- notahacker 4y ago> I think what some people are missing is that the alternative to GPT therapy is often nothing. If I have a problem rattling around in my head at 2 am, I can't easily talk to a therapist. Can't speak for every country, but in the UK you can call 116 123 and speak to the Samaritans. They're not professional therapists but they are trained to be nice and to listen to people unburdening themselves and trying to make decisions. And yes, they're there at 2am. Also, they're people, so they understand you as a fellow person with emotions, not as a correlation between this text input and that text output. I realise some people might actually prefer the lower stakes of the generic machine output. But the people service does - at least in some places - exist.
- mclightning 4y agoOMG. I thought that was a weird thing that I do :D I have a similar experience with ChatGPT. I sometimes just think stuff in my head, conceptual stuff about life, science etc. anything that interests me. Every now and then, I come up with a fruitful position, or a question. ChatGPT helped me document these thoughts through a singular propositional in a dense sentence. ChatGPT breaks it down to simpler sentences that is more understandable If I read it in the future. Basically. For me ChatGPT has been; Zip(Thoughts) --(6-10 words)--(ChatGPT)--> ./Thoughts (50 words; more future proof)
- spookybones 4y agoInterestingly, I posted this link on Hacker News with the exact same title yesterday, and no one found interest in it. I don’t post much on here. I guess timing has more of an effect here than I realized. (I say this with curiosity and no discredit to the current poster.)
- donclark 4y agoThis is a great idea, but I do not want to type to interact with it. It there a voice option available or upcoming?
- satisfice 4y agoI find the whole idea utterly repulsive. While there is no point saying this to people who are really into it, maybe someone will come to the comments wondering if they are the only one who is a hard no for AI assisted journaling.