2 ms·
Yeah, this is a non-issue. The safest way to do it is to make them contractors for the two-week period. Nothing looks bad about a two-week consulting contract.
by geoffschmidt 15y ago
Yeah, this is a non-issue. The safest way to do it is to make them contractors for the two-week period. Nothing looks bad about a two-week consulting contract.
Some trickier issues with trial periods are:
- If they currently have a job, they will typically need to quit the other job before they can do any work for you, even if it is on nights and weekends, and even if it is unpaid. Otherwise there are serious legal issues around IP. So it's no good for poaching.
- A good candidate will have several offers. Even for a two-week trial period, they will probably need to turn down those other offers. That sucks for the candidate because it will really muddy the water with those other companies if in two weeks they want a job again. They could always get offers from other companies, but if the candidate actually wanted to work at those other companies, why didn't she interview there the first time around?
Both of these are surmountable if you are a genuinely desirable employer. For one thing you have the flexibility to talk only to awesome candidates, and awesome candidates are less likely to have problems accepting offers that they previously rejected. (Perhaps even on better terms -- it's very powerful to walk away from a negotiation while you have the upper hand.)