You're misunderstanding the decision at the time. It wasn't a case of "more research needed for decision" but rather "decision needed before more research". Th

You're misunderstanding the decision at the time. It wasn't a case of "more research needed for decision" but rather "decision needed before more research". There isn't really any data showing a clear net negative outcome for any age group. And even if there had been some doubt, the overall picture, was and is that vaccinating everyone is saving lives and it had to be done as quickly as possible. Waiting for more data would have cost more lives. And the results show that decision was correct.