For sure, however… look at the direction of this logic. For fear of an economic change, one is willing to place more burden on the planet and its humans/occupan

For sure, however… look at the direction of this logic. For fear of an economic change, one is willing to place more burden on the planet and its humans/occupants. Economic change largely means “less profit for corporations” and “more bailout for corps.” The poor are still poor just more poor-er… Which usually translates to: “harder hits for consumers” as under capitalism, the profit is protected more than the people. A good direction, imho, may be to edict (from gov) a directional change with a temporal bound, and financial hit for failing to meet that goal. So: “implement X by date or get fined and shut down.” … ignoring that most nations have allowed corporations inroads to government halls making it virtually impossible to make any real changes that will help the people. We’re screwed without drastic changes, it’s our fault, and it’s only going to get worse before it gets better.