Yeah it's not quite language's fault if the language provides a better way to do the same . But equally, the language does provide a bad way to do things. A dev

Yeah it's not quite language's fault if the language provides a better way to do the same . But equally, the language does provide a bad way to do things. A developer in a hurry, or a developer trying to follow the existing convention in the code base, or a developer making a reasonable assumption that's later invalidated - there's no sense in blaming these folks either. We can admonish them all we like, but the bugs keep appearing. I think it's better to be hard on tools, not people. We can make give the people better tools. Telling them the tool is fine and the problem is with them isn't productive and doesn't lead to better software.