The fact that you can't see it doesn't mean others can't. The difference is blindingly obvious to me. Courts do indeed interpret existing laws. The question of

The fact that you can't see it doesn't mean others can't. The difference is blindingly obvious to me. Courts do indeed interpret existing laws. The question of whether current laws regarding human learning apply equally to machine learning is one of interpretation, precisely the sort of thing that is ultimately resolved by court decisions, including appeals potentially up to the supreme court, establishing precedents. Until that process takes place, your interpretation is just your interpretation, not the interpretation.