4 ms·

You can obfuscate your codebase, forcing the ML to generate endless amounts of intangible boilderplate. You can add malevolent code to your code base, which al

You can obfuscate your codebase, forcing the ML to generate endless amounts of intangible boilderplate. You can add malevolent code to your code base, which allows at best for the ml project to gain self-awareness (copilot "shodan") and at worst to just add maleware. Of course you then Dont forget to remove the evil pre-compilation. If you do art, i think the best think to throw AI would be fractal details, aka your picture never ends upon zoom in, but just becomes more art. That or you try to throw the weights in another way.

IYasha 4y ago
Heh-heh... Now you made me want to add some unused crashy-washy honeypot functions to my libraries :)))) This thought kinda sliped into my mind not long ago. But that won't work with the art. You can't put "unused pixels" into your picture. :D (but what about steganography, though?... I wish I could do a science paper on this)
- qikInNdOutReply 4y ago
  You can do horrendous things. All it takes one ground truth provider to not sanitze the input, and meta being trained in. Imagine hosting images, that are poisoned to corrupt training data: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdCs6bPM4is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdCs6bPM4is I wonder if you could add api calls that are billed per call to your open source project and let copilœdUpCode accumulate tremendous bills before sending them at the end of year. Imagine you can get it to do it in useless loops async. I just realized, im watching the "capitalist software revolution eating itself" stallman always prophesized live. Allmende public thrust is being eaten up and all that remains is a dark forrest, stalked by parasite riddled hunters and prey. That is until humanity rebels and dissolves all companies larger then 100 people.
  - throwaway675309 4y ago
    I don't get your comment about copilot code, it's not a zip bomb, when you use copilot or any other type of coding assistant, it just auto completes your code. any reasonably proficient software developer is going to sanitize and proofread appropriately. It's an LLM - not a sandbox to compile and execute code. Same thing applies to the idea of self similar imagery, a.k.a. a fractal. Once you rasterized it, it's by definition no longer recursive in nature.
- throwaway675309 4y ago
  I mean people have had this idea "poisoning the well" for over a year now, but it's nothing more than a thought exercise, since even a whiff of what effectively amounts to malware would completely destroy your reputation as a software developer.

IYasha 4y ago

Heh-heh... Now you made me want to add some unused crashy-washy honeypot functions to my libraries :)))) This thought kinda sliped into my mind not long ago. But that won't work with the art. You can't put "unused pixels" into your picture. :D (but what about steganography, though?... I wish I could do a science paper on this)

qikInNdOutReply 4y ago
You can do horrendous things. All it takes one ground truth provider to not sanitze the input, and meta being trained in. Imagine hosting images, that are poisoned to corrupt training data: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdCs6bPM4is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdCs6bPM4is I wonder if you could add api calls that are billed per call to your open source project and let copilœdUpCode accumulate tremendous bills before sending them at the end of year. Imagine you can get it to do it in useless loops async. I just realized, im watching the "capitalist software revolution eating itself" stallman always prophesized live. Allmende public thrust is being eaten up and all that remains is a dark forrest, stalked by parasite riddled hunters and prey. That is until humanity rebels and dissolves all companies larger then 100 people.
- throwaway675309 4y ago
  I don't get your comment about copilot code, it's not a zip bomb, when you use copilot or any other type of coding assistant, it just auto completes your code. any reasonably proficient software developer is going to sanitize and proofread appropriately. It's an LLM - not a sandbox to compile and execute code. Same thing applies to the idea of self similar imagery, a.k.a. a fractal. Once you rasterized it, it's by definition no longer recursive in nature.
throwaway675309 4y ago
I mean people have had this idea "poisoning the well" for over a year now, but it's nothing more than a thought exercise, since even a whiff of what effectively amounts to malware would completely destroy your reputation as a software developer.