I work at a comapny that has a Web 3.0 NFT as SaaS supporting product. Not one single one of our sales people have been able to make a business case for it tha

I work at a comapny that has a Web 3.0 NFT as SaaS supporting product. Not one single one of our sales people have been able to make a business case for it that could not be implemented cheaper and more effectively with a traditional database solution. In fact, our sales people are told to let the client find the business model, and not guide them in strategy, and just facilitate contact with other clients that have the product offering. If you mean Web 3 as in AR and VR, yes absolutley there is a use for it, but it's going to be niche and not go mainstream fully for an other 5-10 years. Why? You need to convince people they need it and show them the use. I think Google Glass is already making a good effort in the Enterprise INdustrial repair industy, and I think Microsoft Hololens is the same. For AR in your family homes use, I think that TiltFive AR mat is going to be the first to revolutionise tabletop gaming. For VR, this is still very much a single player sport, but I think VRCHat and copies of VRChat is the ones to watch. Facebook dropped the ball on their community idea and is generally laughed at in VR enthusiast circles afaik. VR for in person meetings might only make sense if there is a convincing use case where AR and video metings cannot fill the void. So I think Military and Petrochemical/Nuclear heavy industries, and Medical might have a few convincing use cases. But you wont se this replacing office meetings in person, in an office. also the cost of the products need to come down significantly before it becomes a hit. Oculus cheaper options were a good start, but honestly you need it to be even cheaper.