4 ms·
What I don't understand is how both screen and tmux ship with bindings that conflict with readline. Did nobody notice, or did nobody care? Neither is usable wit
by technomancy 15y ago
What I don't understand is how both screen and tmux ship with bindings that conflict with readline. Did nobody notice, or did nobody care? Neither is usable without fixing this in config.
- lifthrasiir 15y agoHow about C-q as an alternative? It is same as C-v (in the default readline mapping) and generally unused. It does not conflict even with Windows' use of C-v.
- yason 15y agoConfiguring the prefix key to C-z is quite harmless, C-z C-z for suspend is quite ok. (As a bonus hint, binding subkeys with control it's faster to send commands: C-z C-n is faster than C-z n, you just keep control pressed during the command sequence.)
- technomancy 15y agoOf course, it's easy to fix. It just boggles my mind that they would have made that mistake in tmux to begin with when you consider that it's one of the main complaints people have about screen and tmux was supposed to be a "better screen".
- dolzenko 15y agoFunny, just went from screen to tmux in one hour, and that was the first the exact same thing I felt odd about :)