3 ms·
Keep back-pedaling, you'd have supported the same actions if they were done by "the good guys" that lost control of the company. > Why is this hard to understa
by bobleeswagger 4y ago
Keep back-pedaling, you'd have supported the same actions if they were done by "the good guys" that lost control of the company.
> Why is this hard to understand without bringing your politics into it?
Pot, meet kettle.
- mjmsmith 4y agoI thought Dorsey was a doofus whose part-time management contributed to the utter stagnation of the product. And their API changes in 2012 were a shitty thing to do to developers, but perhaps less cowardly than the current changes. I don't use it much these days, but hopefully it'll stick around, even if only as a Parler clone with $5B in debt, mostly populated by angry reply guys whining about wokeness. I'm sure you'll be happy there.
- bobleeswagger 4y agoYour reaction to and obsession with the word "woke" tells us all we need to know about your propaganda driven mind. I don't even have a twitter account, by the way.
- vore 4y agoThis is an absurd gotcha. If someone is pointing out that someone else is employing a political buzzword for that argument, that's somehow having a "propaganda driven mind"? Everyone knows using the word "woke" like this is a cheap shot pejorative that has no substance, but pointing out someone using it like this is some kind of "obsession"? If the original poster didn't intend to be so provocative, maybe they shouldn't have leaned on using the words "woke orthodoxy" to make such a lazy point for them.