3 ms·
Biggest thing is just packaging it as a static site without SSR correct?
by no_wizard 4y ago
Biggest thing is just packaging it as a static site without SSR correct?
- satvikpendem 4y agoCorrect.
- swyx 4y agowhats the point of using nextjs if youre not using ssr? wont CRA work fine?
- leerob 4y agoMaybe they're wanting the image/font/script optimizations Next.js includes, or the other tooling it abstracts (e.g. SWC). You can use Next.js in full-SPA mode (e.g. next export) if you want. I would recommend that or Vite+React over CRA.
- satvikpendem 4y agoDo the image/font/script optimizations also work for SSG? I thought it was just for server side rendering. Also, does `next export` emit raw HMTL/CSS/JS or does it include React as the renderer as well? I seem to remember that `next export` could emit a build that (potentially) could work without JS as well, ie using React as purely a templating language rather than for logic.