2 ms·
Now that they can no longer dismiss it as conspiracy theories, the "free press" is trying to dismiss state-corporate collusion on censorship as something that i
by nhchris 4y ago
Now that they can no longer dismiss it as conspiracy theories, the "free press" is trying to dismiss state-corporate collusion on censorship as something that is routine.
> no one involved in the selection and analysis of the internal communications appears to have any familiarity with (let alone expertise in) how social media and tech platforms are moderated or run.
They didn't have familiarity with it because Twitter was hiding it, and it took essentially a hostile takeover for their practices to come to light.
That social media is crawling with intelligence agents [1] and e.g. kept secret US government influence campaigns [2] is, according to what can now accurately be called regime media, so profoundly uninteresting it's barely worth mention.
[1] https://nypost.com/2022/12/22/facebook-twitter-stocked-with-ex-fbi-cia-officials/ https://nypost.com/2022/12/22/facebook-twitter-stocked-with-...
[2] https://theintercept.com/2022/12/20/twitter-dod-us-military-accounts/ https://theintercept.com/2022/12/20/twitter-dod-us-military-...
- Zigurd 4y agoCommunications nodes, like wireline CO switches and (if it hasn't changed since 3G) mobile data nodes that support lawful intercept (LI) capability are required to be able to hide that (1% of the node capacity, IIRC) traffic from node operators, and to be controlled remotely from an LI console. It's a good bet that social networks, and especially their communications features need to support LI, with similar requirements. Twitters designated contact probably left the building in the first week of Elon.
- nhchris 4y agoLawful intercept is completely different to (shadow)bans, algorithmic suppression, and dissemination of govt. propaganda.