4 ms·

They worst of them are referred to as the Censored Eleven, although you can easily find them intact (albeit, with a warning). It's not a complete list - others

They worst of them are referred to as the Censored Eleven, although you can easily find them intact (albeit, with a warning). It's not a complete list - others have been added to the list since, such as WWII cartoons with highly racist anti-Japanese charactures. An example of one illustrates why the content might be considered problematic: "Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarfs". A contemporary review said, "A satire on Snow White done in blackface, set in modern swing, this is the best in a long time. It's very funny." The "atrocities" include rampant racism, sexism, and other needless offenses with the intent of comedy. Other media of the time, such as Theodore Geisel/Dr Suess' wartime cartoons, often show up on these lists as well. In my opinion, it's good that these cartoons are accessible, with content warnings, yet kept out of normal playback rotation. They're relics of an age gone, thankfully, past.

MisterBastahrd 4y ago
My avatar for the longest time was the Minah Bird in the short Inki and the Minah Bird. For those who are unaware, the Inki character in this short was a small tribal African child in a grass skirt who spent his days attempting to hunt various animals with a spear. And by African, I mean the blackface depiction with the white lips that is reminiscent of old Al Jolson films. Now, I didn't remember ANYTHING about this part of the video. I had last watched it when I was a small child. But I enjoyed the part I did remember, namely the Minah bird, because the bird was methodical, walked in step with Mendelssohn's "The Hebrides," and could whup the crap out of anything. So when it came time to choose an avatar during a period of time when people were not using their faces as screen shots, I used this character. It wasn't until years later that my girlfriend, who happened to be black, asked me why the cartoon bird was my avatar. So I looked it up and... let's just say I discontinued use of the avatar before the topic was broached again.
- DocTomoe 4y ago
  > And by African, I mean the blackface depiction with the white lips that is reminiscent of old Al Jolson films. Not trying to excuse anything, but I wonder how much this kind of depiction was an artefact of animation/video production in a black-and-white or early-colour era, much like how old cartoon animals with black fur often wear white gloves, to give hands/mouths some contrast and make movement visible. Arguably, even "modern" cameras are apparently not designed with noncaucasian skintones in mind, something interest groups do not tire to bring up.
  - defrost 4y ago
    > I wonder how much this kind of depiction was an artefact of animation/video production in a black-and-white or early-colour era Zero. Nada, Nothing. The history of blackface begins with stage and musical performances "aping" actual black musicians and banjo players [1]. There wasn't a lot of film work happening in 1848 . . . [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minstrel_show https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minstrel_show
  - hef19898 4y ago
    Black Face is older then cameras. And as far as modern cameras go, with my limited experience in digital photo post processing, I'd say that the skin tone issue might have something to do with White Balancing. This is tricky in landscapes already, because not everybody carries normal grey cards with them (some people do apparently). And I know from people that shoot a lot more portraits that getting skin tones is always tricky. Not saying it isn't related to cameras, so. But if it is, I'd suspect it to be much more of an issue with in-camera created JPEGs, RAW files don't do white balancing (at least all my Nikons don't). I have zero clue how dedicated video cameras work, so...
  - Terretta 4y ago
    There's a ton of cartoons from the era clearly blackface. However, to your point, even recent photographs in color and black and white depict the tonal contrast one could imagine inspiring the cartoon character in question: https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-3e50441087256791f079ff8f59d472b1-c https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-3e50441087256791f079ff... https://get.pxhere.com/photo/black-and-white-people-white-photography-boy-male-portrait-model-young-child-darkness-black-monochrome-baby-childhood-close-up-face-kids-nose-eyes-children-fun-eye-head-little-beauty-expression-organ-african-portraiture-monochrome-photography-dramatic-portrait-portrait-photography-609192.jpg https://get.pxhere.com/photo/black-and-white-people-white-ph... Until you get to the name Inki... tips their hand a bit.
  - Gordonjcp 4y ago
    > Arguably, even "modern" cameras are apparently not designed with noncaucasian skintones in mind, something interest groups do not tire to bring up. That doesn't make a lot of sense. Can you give an example of why you think that?
- msrenee 4y ago
  Oof, I was hoping you weren't talking and the black bird that did the little hop thing I remember from the cartoons. You were. I didn't remember and probably didn't understand the context of it at the time.
  - MisterBastahrd 4y ago
    I don't think the show is necessarily THAT offensive, for what it's worth. Yes, the depiction of the child's physical appearance is stereotypical of the era (the child's name is problematic too), but the story being told is that of a young child from a hunting community who is learning to hunt by terrorizing insects with his spear until he runs across something (a lion with false teeth) that makes HIM the prey. The lion is just unlucky because he keeps running into the Minah bird whenever he's actually got the child in his grasp. What's sad about the racist aspect of the show is that the depiction of a child at play in this show totally mirrors the behavior of children when they get a bug catching net. It's a Merrie Melodie, so there's no speech or inner monologue that is forced upon all children's shows day. Just a kid being a kid.
    - msrenee 4y ago
      The story is alright. The way they drew the character, definitely not alright. And you know the lovely associations racists make between black people and spears. Could have been a cute animation about a kid biting off more than they could chew. And a hapless lion and a bird that takes not shit. It's a shame they had to shove the nastiness in there.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]

MisterBastahrd 4y ago

My avatar for the longest time was the Minah Bird in the short Inki and the Minah Bird. For those who are unaware, the Inki character in this short was a small tribal African child in a grass skirt who spent his days attempting to hunt various animals with a spear. And by African, I mean the blackface depiction with the white lips that is reminiscent of old Al Jolson films. Now, I didn't remember ANYTHING about this part of the video. I had last watched it when I was a small child. But I enjoyed the part I did remember, namely the Minah bird, because the bird was methodical, walked in step with Mendelssohn's "The Hebrides," and could whup the crap out of anything. So when it came time to choose an avatar during a period of time when people were not using their faces as screen shots, I used this character. It wasn't until years later that my girlfriend, who happened to be black, asked me why the cartoon bird was my avatar. So I looked it up and... let's just say I discontinued use of the avatar before the topic was broached again.

DocTomoe 4y ago
> And by African, I mean the blackface depiction with the white lips that is reminiscent of old Al Jolson films. Not trying to excuse anything, but I wonder how much this kind of depiction was an artefact of animation/video production in a black-and-white or early-colour era, much like how old cartoon animals with black fur often wear white gloves, to give hands/mouths some contrast and make movement visible. Arguably, even "modern" cameras are apparently not designed with noncaucasian skintones in mind, something interest groups do not tire to bring up.
- defrost 4y ago
  > I wonder how much this kind of depiction was an artefact of animation/video production in a black-and-white or early-colour era Zero. Nada, Nothing. The history of blackface begins with stage and musical performances "aping" actual black musicians and banjo players [1]. There wasn't a lot of film work happening in 1848 . . . [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minstrel_show https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minstrel_show
- hef19898 4y ago
  Black Face is older then cameras. And as far as modern cameras go, with my limited experience in digital photo post processing, I'd say that the skin tone issue might have something to do with White Balancing. This is tricky in landscapes already, because not everybody carries normal grey cards with them (some people do apparently). And I know from people that shoot a lot more portraits that getting skin tones is always tricky. Not saying it isn't related to cameras, so. But if it is, I'd suspect it to be much more of an issue with in-camera created JPEGs, RAW files don't do white balancing (at least all my Nikons don't). I have zero clue how dedicated video cameras work, so...
- Terretta 4y ago
  There's a ton of cartoons from the era clearly blackface. However, to your point, even recent photographs in color and black and white depict the tonal contrast one could imagine inspiring the cartoon character in question: https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-3e50441087256791f079ff8f59d472b1-c https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-3e50441087256791f079ff... https://get.pxhere.com/photo/black-and-white-people-white-photography-boy-male-portrait-model-young-child-darkness-black-monochrome-baby-childhood-close-up-face-kids-nose-eyes-children-fun-eye-head-little-beauty-expression-organ-african-portraiture-monochrome-photography-dramatic-portrait-portrait-photography-609192.jpg https://get.pxhere.com/photo/black-and-white-people-white-ph... Until you get to the name Inki... tips their hand a bit.
- Gordonjcp 4y ago
  > Arguably, even "modern" cameras are apparently not designed with noncaucasian skintones in mind, something interest groups do not tire to bring up. That doesn't make a lot of sense. Can you give an example of why you think that?
msrenee 4y ago
Oof, I was hoping you weren't talking and the black bird that did the little hop thing I remember from the cartoons. You were. I didn't remember and probably didn't understand the context of it at the time.
- MisterBastahrd 4y ago
  I don't think the show is necessarily THAT offensive, for what it's worth. Yes, the depiction of the child's physical appearance is stereotypical of the era (the child's name is problematic too), but the story being told is that of a young child from a hunting community who is learning to hunt by terrorizing insects with his spear until he runs across something (a lion with false teeth) that makes HIM the prey. The lion is just unlucky because he keeps running into the Minah bird whenever he's actually got the child in his grasp. What's sad about the racist aspect of the show is that the depiction of a child at play in this show totally mirrors the behavior of children when they get a bug catching net. It's a Merrie Melodie, so there's no speech or inner monologue that is forced upon all children's shows day. Just a kid being a kid.
  - msrenee 4y ago
    The story is alright. The way they drew the character, definitely not alright. And you know the lovely associations racists make between black people and spears. Could have been a cute animation about a kid biting off more than they could chew. And a hapless lion and a bird that takes not shit. It's a shame they had to shove the nastiness in there.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]