Nope. I do recommend reading how the thread started before replying next time. (hint: somebody mentioned the lump of labour fallacy, and somebody else replied

Nope. I do recommend reading how the thread started before replying next time. (hint: somebody mentioned the lump of labour fallacy, and somebody else replied by insisting that economics was a strange field full of fallacies that were actually true statements. He didn't offer any arguments for why economists were wrong to think the lump of labour fallacy was a fallacy, but to be fair to him, this might be because he was too bored to participate in debate rather than because he was desperate to continue the argument despite having no clue what he was arguing about...)