> Once again: what works? Copyright law is built around works,[18] and you have yet to show that even your clients, let alone anyone else, has works violated by

> Once again: what works? Copyright law is built around works,[18] and you have yet to show that even your clients, let alone anyone else, has works violated by infringing works that were not sufficiently transformatively different. I messed around with Stable Diffusion and asked it to generate a lacrosse player. In the output image the crosse had a partial unmistakable unique design, too exact to be considered noise. The piece of equipment is the STX Arrow (a one-off design from a few years back). I certainly think you could argue it was not "transformatively different". Again the STX Arrow is literally the only crosse with that particular design AFAIK stable diffusion img: https://twitter.com/jasonmarks__/status/1570893504339116032 https://twitter.com/jasonmarks__/status/1570893504339116032 STX arrow: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/43/9d/e8/439de85ff04ec0f19f8f629209e57657.jpg https://i.pinimg.com/originals/43/9d/e8/439de85ff04ec0f19f8f...