3 ms·
Has a child violated copyright when they've watched so much Disney that they can now draw a pretty good likeness of one of their characters in an original pose?
by hanoz 4y ago
Has a child violated copyright when they've watched so much Disney that they can now draw a pretty good likeness of one of their characters in an original pose?
- adgjlsfhk1 4y agoprobably (but I doubt there is case law here because suing a child for copyright infringement would be a really bad look)
- sebzim4500 4y agoWait. In this analogy, you think that even watching the film counts as copyright infringement? To be clear, stability have not used SD to generate an image which is infringing, they have merely trained a model which someone else could use to generate (allegedly) infringing material.
- adgjlsfhk1 4y agono. the problem in this analogy would be the copying. i.e. making the drawing
- sebzim4500 4y agoBut Stability hasn't done that so what's with the lawsuit?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jMyles 4y agoThere seems to be a sockpuppet constituency desperately trying to sell "yes" as an answer to this question. It's hard to see how the endgame of this nonsense is anything but total thought control (couched with semantic distinctions between "thought" as it occurs in your biomass and "thought" as simulated in an electronic device).
- notahacker 4y agoIf their parents are selling credits so that people can buy novel pictures with pretty good likenesses of Disney characters drawn by their kid. They'd certainly be relying on "fair use" defences, not "but it's not copyright violation if my kid learned how to do it" defences.