3 ms·
You could say the same about any JPEG on the internet. Yet artists successfully recover licensing fees for those. It's not unthinkable that artists will be paid
by fxtentacle 4y ago
You could say the same about any JPEG on the internet. Yet artists successfully recover licensing fees for those. It's not unthinkable that artists will be paid licensing fees for AI-regurgitated copies of their art, too.
- andybak 4y agoWhich would be fine and not an issue. Plagarism is already handled by copyright law. What won't happen is "x in the style of y" suddenly becoming an enforceable infringement (whether AI produced or not)
- marcinzm 4y ago>It's not unthinkable that artists will be paid licensing fees for AI-regurgitated copies of their art, too. Then companies will just clean-room the thing by getting tens of thousands of developing world artists to draw things and generate training data. Combined with all the works out of copyright and those bought from existing licensors will get you probably the same quality models. That costs money but so does GPT-3 and look where we are. There is no getting the cat back in the bag, it's five blocks away with a rocket strapped to it's back.
- fxtentacle 4y agoClean-room doesn't work for trademarks. No matter how you do it, you're not allowed to sell Mickey Mouse merchandise.