3 ms·
> In accepting the case, the Supreme Court has agreed to answer the question: Does Section 23 exempt interactive computer services from liability “if they speci
by hirundo 4y ago
> In accepting the case, the Supreme Court has agreed to answer the question: Does Section 23 exempt interactive computer services from liability “if they specifically draw attention to information made available by another information content provider”?
On the one hand, yes you should be responsible your own editorial choices in the content you publish. On the other, legislative power to impose that responsibility should be leashed to the existing narrow categories of unprotected speech, under strict scrutiny.
- pyuser583 4y agoWhat narrow categories are you talking about?
- hirundo 4y agohttps://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/IF11072.pdf https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/IF11072.pdf obscenity incitement defamation fraud fighting words true threats speech integral to criminal conduct child pornography I don't agree with all of these, but it's a significant limitation to a legislature to disallow legislation on other speech, and to judge restrictions on these strictly.