4 ms·
You can certainly require fees to be paid. That wouldn't be unusal. Collection agencies are a thing and laws can be adopted to account for AI. Then it's pay x
by arlcode 4y ago
You can certainly require fees to be paid.
That wouldn't be unusal. Collection agencies are a thing and laws can be adopted to account for AI.
Then it's pay x amount of money to use generative art.
And SAAS services can be required to collect those. Self hosted Setups can come later.
- pdntspa 4y agoNo, you can't require fees to be paid. That is my point. You can try -- all of entertainment certainly does with DRM and all these stupids rental models for everything. They can come up with registries and agencies to handle "collections", but all of this is toothless if I can acquire the bits and do whatever I want outside of their purview. If I can find a way to view the artwork I can do what I wish with the knowledge and emotions that I gained from it, and there is nothing you can do to stop me. This is not so different from AI learning, the exact images are not stored in the model. Neither are they "compressed". You cannot get the same exact image out that you put in. People need to get over this awful model of rent-seeking and collections. There are always other ways to monetize.