>Going into too much detail here is somewhat hazardous I don't exactly believe that. And we have other professional exams/processes that generate good profess

>Going into too much detail here is somewhat hazardous I don't exactly believe that. And we have other professional exams/processes that generate good professionals. Folding over and saying "Oh we can't do this, Goodhart's law exists" just seems like a weak reason to me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_is_the_enemy_of_good https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_is_the_enemy_of_good