2 ms·
The headline is deceptive, at best. They didn't build their own filter. They bought them. They didn't design a DIY air purifier. They followed an OS plan. Nothi
by chiefalchemist 4y ago
The headline is deceptive, at best. They didn't build their own filter. They bought them. They didn't design a DIY air purifier. They followed an OS plan. Nothing wrong with that, but that's not what the headline says.
In the name of honesty and transparency "Corsi-Rosenthal Box" should be mentioned in headline.
Also, a HEPA air purifier can be purchased for less than $300. That's important to note because what's built does not qualify as HEPA. This too should be mention when the cost of HEPA is mentioned.
Don't get me wrong. I can see the value, especially if / when HEPA isn't necessary. Unfortunately, this article seems to be more about the reporter than the readers.
- bookofjoe 4y agoI submitted this article — you are right on every count. Also, you make an excellent point about simply buying a certified HEPA filter v making one that isn't anywhere as good and required — in case of the Post writer — two hours of her time and cost $127 for materials. FWIW the Post photos and video feature 20" x 20" x 2" air filters but the Twitter photo: https://twitter.com/bylenasun/status/1604219989224849408?s=20&t=-mhJYDnwwHuY1bgPmiRKGw https://twitter.com/bylenasun/status/1604219989224849408?s=2... features 20" x 20" x 1" filters.
- chiefalchemist 4y agoOh. I wasn't suggesting it shouldn't have been shared. My axe was with the self-centered writer and the lazy editor at the Washington Post. The general idea is worthy. But the execution was utter shite.