4 ms·
That's the first time I'm hearing of suggestions that Google will downrank sites without it. Do you have a source?
by luckylion 4y ago
That's the first time I'm hearing of suggestions that Google will downrank sites without it. Do you have a source?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- johnny_reilly 4y agoAlso intrigued as to whether this could be a cause. I'm certainly not opposed to adding one, but I'd be surprised if it was necessary. But I'm here to learn!
- orangepurple 4y agoMy Facebook ad campaigns were repeatedly rejected until I made that one change. And they never said why it was being rejected. It was only that change that fixed it.
- DwnVoteHoneyPot 4y agoDefinitely need a source. I had a new website that had minimal text content. At first the most popular Google keywords were from privacy and terms! Had to change those pages to no robot.
- SteveGerencser 4y agoIt's only an ads thing. Facebook, Google, etc., all require to those pages be on a website to run ads. They say nothing about Personal websites, but the EU probably does once you start using GA.
- dazc 4y agoUnlikely to be a source but a good benchmark is to have this stuff in place because a)It takes almost no effort, b)You don't know if it makes a difference or not, and c)There is pretty much zero chance it's going to have a negative impact.