4 ms·
That is cool. On rare occasion I need to use Clojure for work projects, and then I really like Cursive + IntelliJ. That is an existence proof that a Common Lisp
by mark_l_watson 4y ago
That is cool. On rare occasion I need to use Clojure for work projects, and then I really like Cursive + IntelliJ. That is an existence proof that a Common Lisp plugin + IntelliJ could be awesome.
I paid $3500 for a LispWorks Pro license and so far I have been paying the $750/year maintenance fee. It is really nice, but as I find myself using Python much more than Common Lisp, I might drop paying maintenance and eventually go back to SBCL. Even with LispWorks I usually use Emacs + Slime.
Anyway, this new SLT plugin is in my “must play with” list. Thanks to the developers.
- sph 4y agoAs someone that can't stand Python anymore and is learning Common Lisp, care to clarify why have you gone the other way?
- vindarel 4y agoHe is using Python scientific libraries for his new work. (ps: can't stand python anymore either)
- mark_l_watson 4y agoThat is correct. I prefer Lisp languages, but if I can get something done much faster using Python because of library availability then I will roll with Python.