4 ms·
> Do you export all raw images from your camera to PNG too? JPG is good enough, and single-pass CD rips are just fine too. No, i keep them in RAW and develop a
by dusted 4y ago
> Do you export all raw images from your camera to PNG too? JPG is good enough, and single-pass CD rips are just fine too.
No, i keep them in RAW and develop a few for albums and print and such.. No, JPGs and PNGs are not good enough, the loss is REAL when you try to actually develop the picture.
I must admit I _REALLY_ don't get this "good enough" mentality.. Like.. Here's this way to get a more precise representation of the music you bought, and you'll go "nah, that's not for me, I prefer whatever random data I happen to get on the first go".. for what? why ?
If you really want to have a different product on every playback, I guess vinyl is the way to go :P
- LarryMullins 4y ago> I must admit I _REALLY_ don't get this "good enough" mentality.. Like.. Here's this way to get a more precise representation of the music you bought, and you'll go "nah, that's not for me, I prefer whatever random data I happen to get on the first go".. for what? why ? The purpose of music is to be perceived. There is no perceptible difference, therefore there is no difference. CD Paranoia/etc are a waste of time, these tools make ripping a CD take several times as long for no tangible benefit.
- LeoPanthera 4y ago> There is no perceptible difference This is often not the case. We're not talking about subtle interpolation differences. Depending on the drive, and the disc, bad rips can be full of music skips, clicks, and pops. It's really annoying to find this out days later after you ripped something. Better to get it right first time.