2 ms·

I believe the point of the GP was that treating women "like first class members of society then" does the opposite: it lowers the number of children. You shoul

I believe the point of the GP was that treating women "like first class members of society then" does the opposite: it lowers the number of children. You should still do it, because obviously, but if you expect more children to be the outcome, you'll be in for a surprise.

nhchris 4y ago
> treating women "like first class members of society then" does the opposite I wouldn't go that far. Just that you can't blame low fertility on poor treatment of women, and that "I will protest society by having fewer children" is a convenient fantasy, not a stance held by a significant number of women. I would wager the true cause of low fertility is something merely correlated to women's rights, because e.g. the UAE have a fertility rate of 1.3, while in Israel it's at 3.0. Source for all the numbers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependencies_by_total_fertility_rate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_d...