4 ms·
The breaking point is when there's a credible answer to that question.
by Helianthus 15y ago
The breaking point is when there's a credible answer to that question.
- devs1010 15y agowell, I don't know if this is any indication of the overall public opinion, but every comment I've looked at on the CNN article is anti-SOPA, I don't know if its the "reddit-types" who have found the article and are commenting or if its really indicative of the average CNN-reader but, if it is, I think that simply voting these clowns out of office may be becoming a more real possibility.
- semanticist 15y agoYou don't vote against a candidate, you vote for one. Are there credible candidates that aren't part of the same system that you could vote for, that don't come associated with some other baggage that might make them toxic to large numbers of votes?
- njharman 15y ago> You don't vote against a candidate, you vote for one. Which is a shame. Always seemed much better and more popular election scheme would be to vote against the one candidate you couldnt stand.
- mike-cardwell 15y agoMaybe you should get one upvote and one downvote per election.
- njharman 15y ago> You don't vote against a candidate, you vote for one. Which is a shame. Always seemed much better and more popular election scheme would be to vote against the one candidate you couldnt stand.
- Natsu 15y agoExactly. That's why I don't think we're there yet. Nobody has found an outlet for all of this frustration that's capable of creating change just yet.