I had additional context in that chat session and whole/part of the whole session is used as input for every output. I think it was fine-tuned on that example f

I had additional context in that chat session and whole/part of the whole session is used as input for every output. I think it was fine-tuned on that example from the paper, that's why it can answer it in isolation. This is interesting, I asked again with different irrelevant to math context in my previous inputs and here is the answer: > You have 28 chairs in the room. If you had 10 chairs and then bought 9 more, you would have a total of 10 + 9 = 28 chairs in the room. 10 + 9 = 28 It's like you say. Statistics of words change based on the context, so you will get different (correct or incorrect) answer depending on the context of your previous inputs.