3 ms·
There's a lot of evidence that he popularized NMN and helped build market demand for it only to later use some regulatory trickery to ensure that a company he's
by nikkwong 4y ago
There's a lot of evidence that he popularized NMN and helped build market demand for it only to later use some regulatory trickery to ensure that a company he's involved with is the only one who's licensed to sell it in the US. This behavior is hostile towards consumers and would only financially benefit him and related parties. It's been frowned upon in NMN circles.
It puts a bad taste in my mouth given the fact that Sinclair tries to brand himself as someone who puts the interests of humanity over his own.
In the video below Dr. Brad Stanfield discusses the controversy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GugcLJ9xvE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GugcLJ9xvE
- idopmstuff 4y agoA quick Amazon search shows a lot of companies selling NMN: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=nmn&crid=12YPXDF097WZV&sprefix=nmn%2Caps%2C155&ref=nb_sb_noss_1 https://www.amazon.com/s?k=nmn&crid=12YPXDF097WZV&sprefix=nm...
- todotask 4y agoSome NMN are fake or shown to have lack of NMN, as far as MAAC10, ProHealth, DoNotAge and probably others provides more than the amount as advertised is genuine.
- idopmstuff 4y agoSure, but the claim was that there's only one company licensed to sell NMN. If that were true, there wouldn't be a dozen companies selling NMN or something they claim to be NMN, regardless of purity/content.